https://arstechnica.com/cars/2017/05/android-automotive-hands-on-google-is-finally-ready-to-talk-about-its-car-os/

Android Automotive hands-on: Google is finally ready to talk about its car OS

No more “concepts”—a real, work-in-progress OS pops up at Google I/O.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.—After years of rumors and speculation, Google finally announced a plan to put a Google-blessed, car version of Android in a production vehicle. Audi and Volvo have both signed up to have their “next gen” vehicles powered by Google’s OS. Previously we’ve seen “concept” Android-as-a-car-OS displays from Google in the form of a “stock Android” car OS in a Maserati and an FCA/Google concept for a “skinned android” infotainment system. With Audi and Volvo, the “concepts” are over, and we’re finally seeing a work-in-progress product that will actually make it to market. And while previous concepts were quietly shown off with no one willing to comment, Google finally seems ready to talk about how Android in the car will work.

First off, there isn’t really a name for the project—internally it’s called “Android Automotive;” externally it doesn’t really have a name other than “Android.” This is a little weird since the smartwatch, TV, and IoT variants of Android all have special names to distinguish them from the smartphone UI. In this case, the most obvious name is already taken by Android Auto, a smartphone-based projected car interface.

As we’ve written before, car infotainment systems can be a mess when it comes to shipping modern technology. Android currently ships in several cars, but Google has never been involved before. Any Android car OSes out there today exist because a car manufacturer grabbed the Android source code on their own and reconfigured it into a car operating system, all without Google’s help. The result is usually a lot of development time and something that is very out of date when it hits the market. For instance: the current 2017 Honda Accord runs Android as the car OS, but it’s version 4.2 Jelly Bean, an OS from 2012. Hyundai is even worse, shipping an Android 2.3 Gingerbread-based system on the 2017 Genesis.

With Google’s involvement, car manufacturers will ship much newer versions of Android. Both the Volvo and Audi on display were running Android 7.0, with a plan to move the system to Android O once it becomes final. Android O was built with a particular eye toward automotive, with features that will really help car use cases (for instance, it has a quicker startup time).

Both cars skinned Google’s existing Android code, showing that the car industry will work a lot like the phone industry. Google produces the core software, and OEMs rebrand the interface with their own artwork. On top of the OS, Google provides apps like Google Maps, Google Music, Hangouts, and other messaging services, and OEMs are free to add their own apps to the OS, too. Audi had a weather app and its own navigation system in addition to Google Maps.

The app platform here is the same thing you’d get in the smartphone-based Android Auto system. To start, there are only two types of apps: music and messaging, and developers don’t get to make their own UIs. Third parties plug into an existing OS-provided UI template that has been approved by various safety committees around the world, providing only an audio feed and icon artwork for an audio app, for instance. There’s a big change in the native car OS, though: car makers can also skin the third-party UI template. That means even apps like Audible and Spotify look like native components of the OS, all decorated potentially with a consistent design. Google does its best to fit in, too, clicking Google Maps over to night mode to match the dark UI.

It seems inevitable that Google will have to produce a Play Store for the car some day, since users need a way to load third-party apps onto the system. Google isn’t ready to talk about that, and there was no app loading solution on either of the demo cars. Like Android, the possibility of competing, manufacturer branded app stores in addition to the Google Play Store wasn’t ruled out, either.

Overall, the OS is very closely based on Android Auto, with the addition of HVAC and radio controls. Google Maps was the same interface you’d get in Android Auto, but the Audi version had sweet 3D building silhouettes, similar to the view you can get in a smartphone if you zoom in a lot. Our demo version also had a fully updated Google Assistant, so you could ask Google questions, navigate somewhere, text someone, control smart home features, and more. There were even a few car-specific commands, like one for controlling the HVAC system.

One interesting feature that was mentioned was the need for a “garage mode.” Today, Android is not really used to being “turned off,” and if you turn on an Android phone that has been sitting in a drawer for some time, the first thing it will do is connect to the Internet and download a thousand updates. This slows down a phone considerably, and it would be a terrible experience every time you turned on your car. So in theory, “garage mode” will be a low-power mode upkeep mode that a parked car can occasionally kick into overnight. The idea is a car parked in a garage or driveway would be able to automatically wake up on battery power, connect to Wi-Fi, and download app and system updates. Then when you’re ready to use the car, everything will be updated and ready to go.

When we did our recent deep dive into the car infotainment market, my favorite interface used the digital gauge cluster for the infotainment system, putting critical information like a map right in front of the driver. Neither of the demo cars could do this with Google Maps. Google said this was something it was working on, but the gauge cluster is usually a separate computer that needs to run a real-time OS for safety reasons (a laggy speedometer is unacceptable), and therefore it can’t be Android-based. The company is working on ways to better communicate with the gauge cluster system, though, and the Audi demoed could show Audi’s map system in the background—there was no cross over from Google apps yet.

The big takeaways here were that both systems proved incredibly snappy and responsive. They have an app platform that, while limited to only music and messaging, can actually work across car manufacturers (which is practically unheard of in the industry). The highlighted plan is to ship a brand new version of Android, instead of something that is five years old. And while Google rightfully gets a lot of criticism for the state of smartphone Android updates, Android’s mobile update model is still a lot better than what exists in the car industry right now. If Google keeps it up, QNX might actually have some competition in the car OS space.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s